// @ts-nocheck
const { classify } = require('../supportedBranches.js')

function runChecklist({
  committers,
  files,
  pull_request,
  log,
  maintainers,
  reviews,
  user,
  userIsMaintainer,
}) {
  const allByName = files.every(
    ({ filename }) =>
      filename.startsWith('pkgs/by-name/') && filename.split('/').length > 4,
  )

  const packages = files
    .filter(({ filename }) => filename.startsWith('pkgs/by-name/'))
    .map(({ filename }) => filename.split('/')[3])
    .filter(Boolean)

  const eligible = !packages.length
    ? new Set()
    : packages
        .map((pkg) => new Set(maintainers[pkg]))
        .reduce((acc, cur) => acc?.intersection(cur) ?? cur)

  const approvals = new Set(
    reviews
      .filter(
        ({ state, commit }) =>
          state === 'APPROVED' &&
          // Only approvals for the current head SHA count, otherwise authors could push
          // bad code between the approval and the merge.
          commit?.oid === pull_request.head.sha,
      )
      .map(({ user }) => user.id),
  )

  // A "changes requested" review from a committer blocks both the merge queue and
  // auto-merge, even if it was made on an older commit (unlike approvals, GitHub does
  // not auto-dismiss changes-requested reviews on push). For each committer, take their
  // latest actionable review; if it's CHANGES_REQUESTED, they're blocking the PR.
  // Dismissed reviews surface as DISMISSED and comment-only follow-ups as COMMENTED, so
  // both are skipped naturally — the prior actionable review still stands until the
  // committer explicitly approves or requests changes again.
  const committerReviewState = new Map()
  for (const { user, state } of reviews) {
    if (
      committers.has(user.id) &&
      ['APPROVED', 'CHANGES_REQUESTED'].includes(state)
    ) {
      committerReviewState.set(user.id, state)
    }
  }
  const noBlockingReviews = !Array.from(committerReviewState.values()).includes(
    'CHANGES_REQUESTED',
  )

  const checklist = {
    'PR targets a [development branch](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/-/ci/README.md#branch-classification).':
      classify(pull_request.base.ref).type.includes('development'),
    'PR touches only files of packages in `pkgs/by-name/`.': allByName,
    'PR is at least one of:': {
      'Approved by a [committer](https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/teams/nixpkgs-committers).':
        committers.intersection(approvals).size > 0,
      'Backported via label.':
        pull_request.user.login === 'nixpkgs-ci[bot]' &&
        pull_request.head.ref.startsWith('backport-'),
      'Opened by a [committer](https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/teams/nixpkgs-committers).':
        committers.has(pull_request.user.id),
      'Opened by [@r-ryantm](https://nix-community.github.io/nixpkgs-update/r-ryantm/).':
        pull_request.user.login === 'r-ryantm',
    },
    'PR is not a draft': !pull_request.draft,
    // CI state is intentionally *not* a checklist item: auto-merge exists precisely to
    // cover unfinished CI, and an already-failed CI is reported via the merge message
    // (see merge() below) rather than a blanket refusal.
    'PR is not blocked by a "changes requested" review from a [committer](https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/teams/nixpkgs-committers).':
      noBlockingReviews,
  }

  if (user) {
    checklist[
      `${user.login} is a member of [@NixOS/nixpkgs-maintainers](https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/teams/nixpkgs-maintainers).`
    ] = userIsMaintainer
    if (allByName) {
      // We can only determine the below, if all packages are in by-name, since
      // we can't reliably relate changed files to packages outside by-name.
      checklist[
        `${user.login} is a maintainer of all touched packages on the ${pull_request.base.ref} branch.`
      ] = eligible.has(user.id)
    }
  } else {
    // This is only used when no user is passed, i.e. for labeling.
    checklist['PR has maintainers eligible to merge.'] = eligible.size > 0
  }

  const result = Object.values(checklist).every((v) =>
    typeof v === 'boolean' ? v : Object.values(v).some(Boolean),
  )

  log('checklist', JSON.stringify(checklist))
  log('eligible', JSON.stringify(Array.from(eligible)))
  log('result', result)

  return {
    checklist,
    eligible,
    result,
  }
}

// The merge command must be on a separate line and not within codeblocks or html comments.
// Codeblocks can have any number of ` larger than 3 to open/close. We only look at code
// blocks that are not indented, because the later regex wouldn't match those anyway.
function hasMergeCommand(body) {
  return (body ?? '')
    .replace(/<!--.*?-->/gms, '')
    .replace(/(^`{3,})[^`].*?\1/gms, '')
    .match(/^@NixOS\/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge\s*$/im)
}

async function handleMergeComment({ github, body, node_id, reaction }) {
  if (!hasMergeCommand(body)) return

  await github.graphql(
    `mutation($node_id: ID!, $reaction: ReactionContent!) {
      addReaction(input: {
        content: $reaction,
        subjectId: $node_id
      })
      { clientMutationId }
    }`,
    { node_id, reaction },
  )
}

async function handleMerge({
  github,
  context,
  core,
  log,
  dry,
  pull_request,
  events,
  reviews,
  maintainers,
  getTeamMembers,
  getUser,
}) {
  const pull_number = pull_request.number

  const committers = new Set(
    (await getTeamMembers('nixpkgs-committers')).map(({ id }) => id),
  )

  const files = (
    await github.rest.pulls.listFiles({
      ...context.repo,
      pull_number,
      per_page: 100,
    })
  ).data

  // Early exit to prevent treewides from using up a lot of API requests (and time!) to list
  // all the files in the pull request. For now, the merge-bot will not work when 100 or more
  // files are touched in a PR - which should be more than fine.
  // TODO: Find a more efficient way of downloading all the *names* of the touched files,
  // including an early exit when the first non-by-name file is found.
  if (files.length >= 100) return false

  const noPrFailuresState = (
    await github.rest.repos.listCommitStatusesForRef({
      ...context.repo,
      ref: pull_request.head.sha,
      per_page: 100,
    })
  ).data.find(({ context }) => context === 'no PR failures')?.state

  // Only look through comments *after* the latest (force) push.
  const lastPush = events.findLastIndex(
    ({ event, sha, commit_id }) =>
      ['committed', 'head_ref_force_pushed'].includes(event) &&
      (sha ?? commit_id) === pull_request.head.sha,
  )

  const comments = events.slice(lastPush + 1).filter(
    ({ event, body, user, node_id }) =>
      ['commented', 'reviewed'].includes(event) &&
      hasMergeCommand(body) &&
      // Ignore comments where the user has been deleted already.
      user &&
      // Ignore comments which had already been responded to by the bot.
      (dry ||
        !events.some(
          ({ event, body }) =>
            ['commented'].includes(event) &&
            // We're only testing this hidden reference, but not the author of the comment.
            // We'll just assume that nobody creates comments with this marker on purpose.
            // Additionally checking the author is quite annoying for local debugging.
            body.match(new RegExp(`^<!-- comment: ${node_id} -->$`, 'm')),
        )),
  )

  // Returns `{ reaction, messages }`: the reaction to leave on the merge comment and the
  // lines to append to the bot's reply. Throws only on an unexpected API error.
  async function merge() {
    if (dry) {
      core.info(`Merging #${pull_number}... (dry)`)
      return { reaction: 'ROCKET', messages: ['Merge completed (dry)'] }
    }

    // Using GraphQL mutations instead of the REST /merge endpoint, because the latter
    // doesn't work with Merge Queues. We now have merge queues enabled on all development
    // branches, so we don't need a fallback for regular merges.
    try {
      const resp = await github.graphql(
        `mutation($node_id: ID!, $sha: GitObjectID) {
          enqueuePullRequest(input: {
            expectedHeadOid: $sha,
            pullRequestId: $node_id
          })
          {
            clientMutationId,
            mergeQueueEntry { mergeQueue { url } }
          }
        }`,
        { node_id: pull_request.node_id, sha: pull_request.head.sha },
      )
      log('merge', 'Queued for merge')
      return {
        reaction: 'ROCKET',
        messages: [
          `:heavy_check_mark: [Queued](${resp.enqueuePullRequest.mergeQueueEntry.mergeQueue.url}) for merge (#306934)`,
        ],
      }
    } catch (e) {
      log('Enqueuing failed', e.response.errors[0].message)
    }

    // Enqueuing fails when the required status checks are not satisfied, yet. If CI has
    // already failed, enabling auto-merge would be pointless: it would never fire, and
    // fixing CI requires a new push, which invalidates this merge command anyway (we only
    // act on comments after the latest push). So we don't enable auto-merge and instead
    // ask for a fresh command once CI is green again.
    if (['error', 'failure'].includes(noPrFailuresState)) {
      log('merge', 'CI has failed, not enabling auto-merge')
      return {
        reaction: 'THUMBS_DOWN',
        messages: [
          ':x: Pull Request could not be merged: CI has failed (#305350).',
          '',
          '> [!TIP]',
          '> PRs cannot be merged while CI is failing.',
          '> Once CI is passing, comment `@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge` again.',
        ],
      }
    }

    // CI has not finished yet, so we enable auto-merge. We could also only use auto-merge,
    // but this often gets stuck for no apparent reason.
    try {
      await github.graphql(
        `mutation($node_id: ID!, $sha: GitObjectID) {
          enablePullRequestAutoMerge(input: {
            expectedHeadOid: $sha,
            pullRequestId: $node_id
          })
          { clientMutationId }
        }`,
        { node_id: pull_request.node_id, sha: pull_request.head.sha },
      )
      log('merge', 'Auto-merge enabled')
      return {
        reaction: 'ROCKET',
        messages: [
          `:heavy_check_mark: Enabled Auto Merge (#306934)`,
          '',
          '> [!TIP]',
          '> [Auto Merge](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/incorporating-changes-from-a-pull-request/automatically-merging-a-pull-request) will queue this PR once required CI checks succeed.',
          '> If CI fails instead, fixing it needs a new push, which disables Auto Merge and invalidates this command — comment `@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge` again once CI is green.',
          '> If GitHub gets stuck even though CI passed (it sometimes does), leaving another approval should kick off the merge.',
        ],
      }
    } catch (e) {
      log('Auto Merge failed', e.response.errors[0].message)
      throw new Error(e.response.errors[0].message)
    }
  }

  for (const comment of comments) {
    log('comment', comment.node_id)

    async function react(reaction) {
      if (dry) {
        core.info(`Reaction ${reaction} on ${comment.node_id} (dry)`)
        return
      }

      await handleMergeComment({
        github,
        body: comment.body,
        node_id: comment.node_id,
        reaction,
      })
    }

    async function isMaintainer(username) {
      try {
        return (
          (
            await github.rest.teams.getMembershipForUserInOrg({
              org: context.repo.owner,
              team_slug: 'nixpkgs-maintainers',
              username,
            })
          ).data.state === 'active'
        )
      } catch (e) {
        if (e.status === 404) return false
        else throw e
      }
    }

    const { result, eligible, checklist } = runChecklist({
      committers,
      files,
      pull_request,
      log,
      maintainers,
      reviews,
      user: comment.user,
      userIsMaintainer: await isMaintainer(comment.user.login),
    })

    const body = [
      `<!-- comment: ${comment.node_id} -->`,
      `@${comment.user.login} wants to merge this PR.`,
      '',
      'Requirements to merge this PR with `@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge`:',
      ...Object.entries(checklist).flatMap(([msg, res]) =>
        typeof res === 'boolean'
          ? `- :${res ? 'white_check_mark' : 'x'}: ${msg}`
          : [
              `- :${Object.values(res).some(Boolean) ? 'white_check_mark' : 'x'}: ${msg}`,
              ...Object.entries(res).map(
                ([msg, res]) =>
                  `  - ${res ? ':white_check_mark:' : ':white_large_square:'} ${msg}`,
              ),
            ],
      ),
      '',
    ]

    if (eligible.size > 0 && !eligible.has(comment.user.id)) {
      const users = await Promise.all(
        Array.from(eligible, async (id) => (await getUser(id)).login),
      )
      body.push(
        '> [!TIP]',
        '> Maintainers eligible to merge are:',
        ...users.map((login) => `> - ${login}`),
        '',
      )
    }

    if (result) {
      try {
        const { reaction, messages } = await merge()
        await react(reaction)
        body.push(...messages)
      } catch (e) {
        await react('THUMBS_DOWN')
        // Remove the HTML comment with node_id reference to allow retrying this merge on the next run.
        body.shift()
        body.push(`:x: Merge failed with: ${e} (#371492)`)
      }
    } else {
      await react('THUMBS_DOWN')
      body.push(':x: Pull Request could not be merged (#305350)')
    }

    if (dry) {
      core.info(body.join('\n'))
    } else {
      await github.rest.issues.createComment({
        ...context.repo,
        issue_number: pull_number,
        body: body.join('\n'),
      })
    }

    if (result) break
  }

  const { result } = runChecklist({
    committers,
    files,
    pull_request,
    log,
    maintainers,
    reviews,
  })

  // Returns a boolean, which indicates whether the PR is merge-bot eligible in principle.
  // This is used to set the respective label in bot.js.
  return result
}

module.exports = {
  handleMerge,
  handleMergeComment,
}
