I don't think the worry about confusion applies anymore because nowadays CI
will tell you if you target staging-nixos when you should be targeting staging.
On the other hand, I was confused why kernel updates didn't show up as
NixOS test rebuilds...
This is a functional change, but there's no known consumer of this
interface, and if we want to trigger review request for PRs it's
convenient for these paths to be absolute
ci: Trigger review requests for module maintainers
It does evaluate for macOS – at least when I’m not busy adding a
warning to `x86_64-darwin` – but Darwin‐only changes to the test
driver won’t cause rebuilds on Hydra anyway.
This moves the parsing of ci/OWNERS into the Nix sandbox. We also get
rid of checking out the nixpkgs repo another time in the reviewers
workflow - we already have everything we need in the eval/compare job.
The creation of owners.txt in this way is only temporary, it should
eventually be moved further, similar to how maintainers.json is
currently migrating to a maintainer map for the whole repo stored on the
target branch as artifact.
Instead of setting the maintainer-related labels based entirely on Eval
results, this uses the new maintainer map from the target branch. This
allows labeling PRs correctly, that had been created *before* a
contributor became a maintainer of the respective package.
There is no point in passing these arguments around between all the
different parts of the eval chain - these global settings should surely
not be modified between different steps.
This also makes it simpler to add new arguments like extra nixpkgs
configuration.
This creates a simple mapping of all packages to github ids of all their
maintainers. This is uploaded as an artifact and is then available for
download on the latest commit of each branch with a merge queue. This
will allow scheduled jobs to use this information for setting
maintainer-related labels, to request reviewers and to implement the
merge-bot.
The advantage over querying this information directly via Nix in each
case: The scheduled job does not need to install Nix and does not need
to checkout the target branch.
Compared to obtaining the maintainer information just for a single PR
during Eval, this will allow retroactively changing maintainers for a
package: For example, it allows to request a new maintainer as reviewer
for a PR that was created before they became maintainer, but is still
open - and similarly for maintainer labels and merge-bot rights.
None of these extensions are implemented by this PR, yet.
Currently the `diff-<system>` artifacts are 6-7 MB in size - and almost
all of that is the `paths.json` file, which is only used to generate the
diff itself. This had been stored in the artifact previously for
debugging purposes. Ever since we moved to Cachix this is not required
anymore, since it's possible to run the same eval locally and thus fetch
the `eval.singleSystem` result, including `paths.json`, from Cachix.
This will be even more helpful when the next step adds `meta.json` -
which is magnitudes bigger than `paths.json`.
In a recent change, the path matching was simplified in maintainers.nix.
This revealed a pre-existing logic bug: Packages without `meta.position`
would get an empty string as their file name. The change would then
cause this empty string to always be matched, which lead to maintainer
pings for these packages in seemingly random PRs, when some of their
dependencies were changed.
We should never try to ping maintainers through package aliases, this
can only lead to errors. One example case is, where an attribute is a
throw alias, but then re-introduced in a PR. This would trigger the
throw. By disabling aliases, we can fallback gracefully.
This allows requesting reviewers for pure refactor PRs, which don't
cause a rebuild of the package. This is only possible for by-name,
because only here the package names can be inferred from the filenames.
This adds support to ping maintainers when arbitrary files in by-name
are changed, as long as they still cause a rebuild. For example, this is
the case when changing .json files with version metadata. These were
previously not detected as belonging to the package, and didn't cause
maintainer pings.
The only reason for the additional `lib.hasSuffix` check was, that the
`lib.removePrefix` was broken - it was never adjusted when porting this
from ofborg, so the relative path was wrong and no prefix ever removed,
since no packages are in `ci/`.
This additionally strips the leading `/`, so that `relevantFilenames`
will then have paths starting with `pkgs/...`, similar to how git
reports those paths in the `changedpathsjson` file. This allows simple
equality comparison.
