This is a functional change, but there's no known consumer of this
interface, and if we want to trigger review request for PRs it's
convenient for these paths to be absolute
ci: Trigger review requests for module maintainers
Instead of setting the maintainer-related labels based entirely on Eval
results, this uses the new maintainer map from the target branch. This
allows labeling PRs correctly, that had been created *before* a
contributor became a maintainer of the respective package.
In a recent change, the path matching was simplified in maintainers.nix.
This revealed a pre-existing logic bug: Packages without `meta.position`
would get an empty string as their file name. The change would then
cause this empty string to always be matched, which lead to maintainer
pings for these packages in seemingly random PRs, when some of their
dependencies were changed.
We should never try to ping maintainers through package aliases, this
can only lead to errors. One example case is, where an attribute is a
throw alias, but then re-introduced in a PR. This would trigger the
throw. By disabling aliases, we can fallback gracefully.
This allows requesting reviewers for pure refactor PRs, which don't
cause a rebuild of the package. This is only possible for by-name,
because only here the package names can be inferred from the filenames.
This adds support to ping maintainers when arbitrary files in by-name
are changed, as long as they still cause a rebuild. For example, this is
the case when changing .json files with version metadata. These were
previously not detected as belonging to the package, and didn't cause
maintainer pings.
The only reason for the additional `lib.hasSuffix` check was, that the
`lib.removePrefix` was broken - it was never adjusted when porting this
from ofborg, so the relative path was wrong and no prefix ever removed,
since no packages are in `ci/`.
This additionally strips the leading `/`, so that `relevantFilenames`
will then have paths starting with `pkgs/...`, similar to how git
reports those paths in the `changedpathsjson` file. This allows simple
equality comparison.
Not all packages that are reported as changed will actually exist on the
platform that the maintainers are colleted on.
This is the case for some attributes that are only available on Darwin
or explicitly set to `null` on Linux. By filtering out packages without
maintainers, these are ignored - and we should potentially get a small
performance improvement as well.
By now, these files have been changed enough to not need the "vendored
from" notes anymore. These links would still be there when going through
the history of the file, but today GHA CI has not many similarities
anymore to what ofborg did, so these are not really helpful.
It makes no sense to check newly added attrpaths for maintainers on the
target branch - by definition these attrpaths won't exist, yet. We can
avoid falling back to `null` for these etc.
This should not be necessary anymore, because packages that fail to
evaluate should already be filtered out by the attrpath generation step
in main eval.
This change pings maintainers of actually removed packages, aka where
the package's expression is deleted.
This will not ping maintainers of packages that become invisible,
because a (transitive) dependency of them is marked as insecure or
broken.
compare/maintainers.nix needs to access the current checkout to check
attrpaths, but makes the mistake of using lib from that checkout as
well. All other code in ci/ uses the pinned nixpkgs instance, so
maintainers.nix should do so as well.
We need to pass through the maintainers and teams positions from the
original meta so pings work correctly, since check-meta clobbers the
original attribute positions in them.
Tested with `maintainers/scripts/get-maintainer-pings-between.sh` on a
handful of major packages maintained by both individuals and teams.
Sometimes it is quite useful to output names instead of GitHub IDs, e.g.
for maintainer scripts that show you who you would ping. Add this as an
option, but keep the existing default.
Various improvements such as:
1. Avoiding deduplications when there can't be any duplicates
2. Avoiding O(n^2) deduplications
3. Using builtins.any to avoid list allocations
4. Using builtins.concatMap instead of lib.flatten when it's known that there's only one level of nesting
5. Using builtins.groupBy instead of folding with an accumulator
In particular 5. should fix CI exceeding the stack size on staging: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/12989244871/job/36240781244?pr=377253
While 2. in particular should make CI a lot faster.
The handles can change over time and there's nothing guaranteeing the
ones in the maintainer list are up-to-date. In comparison GitHub IDs
never change.
Currently we need to rely on ofborg requesting reviews from package
maintainers, which takes a while with ofborg's eval queue. Since
recently we're doing faster evaluations with GitHub Actions, which contain all
necessary information to determine reviewers of changed packages the
same way ofborg does. This PR takes advantage of that.
