This commit was created by a combination of scripts and tools:
- an ast-grep script to prefix things in meta with `lib.`,
- a modified nixf-diagnose / nixf combination to remove unused `with
lib;`, and
- regular nixfmt.
Co-authored-by: Wolfgang Walther <walther@technowledgy.de>
If a Python package does not come with either `format` or `pyproject` we
consider it a setuptools build, that calls `setup.py` directly, which is
deprecated.
This change, as a first step, migrates a large chunk of these packages to
set setuptools as their explicit format
This is so we can unify the problem space for the next step of the
migration.
This reverts commit 65a333600d.
This wasn't tested for correctness with something like fodwatch [0],
and should not have been (self-)merged so quickly, especially without
further review.
It also resulted in the breakage of at least one package [1] (and that's
the one we know of and was caught).
A few packages that were updated in between this commit and this revert
were not reverted back to using `rev`, but other than that, this is a
1:1 revert.
[0]: https://codeberg.org/raphaelr/fodwatch
[1]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/396904 / 758551e458
After final improvements to the official formatter implementation,
this commit now performs the first treewide reformat of Nix files using it.
This is part of the implementation of RFC 166.
Only "inactive" files are reformatted, meaning only files that
aren't being touched by any PR with activity in the past 2 months.
This is to avoid conflicts for PRs that might soon be merged.
Later we can do a full treewide reformat to get the rest,
which should not cause as many conflicts.
A CI check has already been running for some time to ensure that new and
already-formatted files are formatted, so the files being reformatted here
should also stay formatted.
This commit was automatically created and can be verified using
nix-build a08b3a4d19.tar.gz \
--argstr baseRev b32a094368
result/bin/apply-formatting $NIXPKGS_PATH
In preparation for the deprecation of `stdenv.isX`.
These shorthands are not conducive to cross-compilation because they
hide the platforms.
Darwin might get cross-compilation for which the continued usage of `stdenv.isDarwin` will get in the way
One example of why this is bad and especially affects compiler packages
https://www.github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/343059
There are too many files to go through manually but a treewide should
get users thinking when they see a `hostPlatform.isX` in a place where it
doesn't make sense.
```
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "stdenv.is" "stdenv.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "stdenv'.is" "stdenv'.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "clangStdenv.is" "clangStdenv.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "gccStdenv.is" "gccStdenv.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "stdenvNoCC.is" "stdenvNoCC.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "inherit (stdenv) is" "inherit (stdenv.hostPlatform) is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "buildStdenv.is" "buildStdenv.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "effectiveStdenv.is" "effectiveStdenv.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "originalStdenv.is" "originalStdenv.hostPlatform.is"
```
I’ve had an extended absence from Nix work and no longer actively
use a bunch of packages I used to maintain, so remove myself as a
maintainer from things I can’t usefully review/test changes for
as I ease back into things. This does unfortunately leave a few
packages orphaned (`stm32loader`, `tinyprog`, `python3Packages.fx2`,
and `python3Packages.jsonmerge`).
First, this closes#167972 by explicitly disabling Python tests for the
backported pycrypto library. Those tests were written for Python 2 only.
Furthermore, the meta.knownVulnerabilities attribute was added as the
last weechat-otr upstream release was in 2018-03 [0] and the backported
Debian package of pycrypto is from 2020-04 [1]. As there are no known
vulnerabilities for weechat-otr itself, pycrypto "is unmaintained,
obsolete, and contains security vulnerabilities" [2]. Even with Debian's
patches, this is no good situation.
As weechat-otr being a security and privacy related software, it should
be made obvious, that its code base is old and unmaintained.
[0] https://github.com/mmb/weechat-otr/releases/tag/v1.9.2
[1] https://salsa.debian.org/sramacher/python-crypto/-/tags/debian%2F2.6.1-13.1
[2] https://www.pycrypto.org/
