Cargo 1.84.0 seems to have changed the output format of cargo vendor
again, once again invalidating fetchCargoTarball FOD hashes. It's
time to fix this once and for all, switching across the board to
fetchCargoVendor, which is not dependent on cargo vendor's output
format.
In preparation for the deprecation of `stdenv.isX`.
These shorthands are not conducive to cross-compilation because they
hide the platforms.
Darwin might get cross-compilation for which the continued usage of `stdenv.isDarwin` will get in the way
One example of why this is bad and especially affects compiler packages
https://www.github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/343059
There are too many files to go through manually but a treewide should
get users thinking when they see a `hostPlatform.isX` in a place where it
doesn't make sense.
```
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "stdenv.is" "stdenv.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "stdenv'.is" "stdenv'.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "clangStdenv.is" "clangStdenv.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "gccStdenv.is" "gccStdenv.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "stdenvNoCC.is" "stdenvNoCC.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "inherit (stdenv) is" "inherit (stdenv.hostPlatform) is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "buildStdenv.is" "buildStdenv.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "effectiveStdenv.is" "effectiveStdenv.hostPlatform.is"
fd --type f "\.nix" | xargs sd --fixed-strings "originalStdenv.is" "originalStdenv.hostPlatform.is"
```
I made this, and I almost completely deleted it because I was fully
on board with lz-n again. However, I have been using it and lz-n
simultaneosly and trying them out.
I wish to publish lze after all. I like it a lot.
It works completely differently from lz-n and has a different handler
api, but has a similar plugin spec.
Update pkgs/development/lua-modules/overrides.nix
Co-authored-by: Gaétan Lepage <33058747+GaetanLepage@users.noreply.github.com>
When installing a lua package that depends on luarocks, luarocks was not
capable of recognizing the luarocks module: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/316009 .
As explained here https://github.com/luarocks/luarocks/issues/1659,
luarocks needs a manifest to recognize the package.
I first attempted to generate a manifest with `luarocks-admin
make-manifest` on our current manual luarocks derivation but this ended
up being too hackish as the `make-manifest` requires a .rockspec or
.rock to work, which we had not.
It seemed simpled to just rename the current manual luarocks derivation to luarocks_bootstrap
in order to break cyclic dependencies in buildLuarocksPackage and add a
generated luarocks derivation. Previously it was impossible to test
luarocks because of the cyclic dependency but we will now be able to
test the generated derivation.
