After final improvements to the official formatter implementation,
this commit now performs the first treewide reformat of Nix files using it.
This is part of the implementation of RFC 166.
Only "inactive" files are reformatted, meaning only files that
aren't being touched by any PR with activity in the past 2 months.
This is to avoid conflicts for PRs that might soon be merged.
Later we can do a full treewide reformat to get the rest,
which should not cause as many conflicts.
A CI check has already been running for some time to ensure that new and
already-formatted files are formatted, so the files being reformatted here
should also stay formatted.
This commit was automatically created and can be verified using
nix-build a08b3a4d19.tar.gz \
--argstr baseRev b32a094368
result/bin/apply-formatting $NIXPKGS_PATH
In the tarball job:
````
checking find-tarballs.nix
error: while evaluating anonymous function at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:6:1, called from undefined position:
while evaluating ‘operator’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:27:16, called from undefined position:
while evaluating ‘immediateDependenciesOf’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:39:29, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:27:44:
while evaluating anonymous function at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/attrsets.nix:224:10, called from undefined position:
while evaluating anonymous function at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:40:37, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/attrsets.nix:224:16:
while evaluating ‘derivationsIn’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:42:19, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:40:40:
while evaluating ‘optional’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/lists.nix:175:20, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:44:33:
while evaluating ‘canEval’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:48:13, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/maintainers/scripts/find-tarballs.nix:44:43:
while evaluating the attribute ‘pkgs’ of the derivation ‘ruby-dev-2.3.1-p0’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/pkgs/build-support/trivial-builders.nix:10:14:
while evaluating ‘override’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/customisation.nix:60:22, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/pkgs/development/interpreters/ruby/dev.nix:10:13:
while evaluating ‘makeOverridable’ at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/customisation.nix:54:24, called from /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/customisation.nix:60:31:
anonymous function at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/pkgs/development/ruby-modules/bundix/default.nix:1:1 called with unexpected argument ‘ruby’, at /tmp/nix-build-nixpkgs-tarball-16.09pre1234.abcdef.drv-0/nixpkgs/lib/customisation.nix:56:12
````
The idea is to bundle ruby, bundler and bundix together. I was
having issues where bundler was installed with ruby 2.3.0 and I wanted to use
ruby 2.0.0.
With this change all the developer has to do is install `ruby_2_0_0.dev`
either in his environment or in a nix-shell.
